Colonoscopic tattooing of colorectal neoplasms
with India ink is currently the preferred technique for tumor localization
during subsequent laparoscopic resections. It is safe (complications 0.22%) and
accurate (90.5 - 97.9%).1,2,3 Dye spillage occurs in 2.4 – 13 %
patients and is usually asymptomatic.4
Tattooing may sometimes result in rare findings that cause diagnostic
dilemma during surgery.
A 65 year old male presented with
history of weight loss, recent onset constipation and bleeding of bright red per
rectum for 1 year. His general physical and abdominal examination was
unremarkable as was digital rectal examination and proctoscopy.
Colonoscopy revealed large
polypoidal sigmoid colon tumor which was tattooed with India ink. Admittedly
the tumor in our patient was large and may well have been localized without
tattooing also.
Endoscopic biopsy suggested well differentiated
adenocarcinoma. Contrast enhanced abdominal
computed tomography scan showed large, non obstructing tumor involving distal sigmoid
colon (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Contrast enhanced abdominal computed tomography scan showing large enhancing
tumor in distal sigmoid colon
The patient was
planned for laparoscopy assisted radical sigmoid colectomy. At initial laparoscopy there were dark
pigmented macules diffusely present over peritoneal cavity raising suspicion of
metastatic malignant melanoma (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Laparoscopy showing
multiple pigmented patches over peritoneum with minimal free fluid
Frozen section from multiple such
lesions did not reveal tumor deposits and was proceeded with. Final
histopathology staging was pT2N0M0. On Hematoxylin & Eosin (H &
E) staining, pigmented lesions were due to black pigment (presumably carbon
from India ink) laden macrophages. Negative immunohistochemistry (IHC) for HMB45 & Melan A ruled out melanocytes as causative for pigmentation (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Microphotograph: H & E stain - showing black pigment laden
macrophages; IHC
HMB45 - negative for melanocytes
The postulated mechanisms for such findings include
intraperitoneal spillage of India ink or via pigment laden macrophages.5
Awareness of this entity is
important for surgeons to avoid misinterpretation of peritoneal findings at
laparoscopy.
References
1. Nizam
R, Siddiqi N, Landas SK, Caplan DS, Holtzapple PG. Colonic tattooing with India
ink: Benefits, risks and alternatives. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91(9):1804-08
2. Acuna
SA, Elmi M, Shah PS, Coburn NG, Quereshi FA. Preoperative localization of
colorectal cancer: A systematic review and metanalysis. Surg Endosc
2017;31(6):2366-2379
3. Cho
YB, Lee WY, Yun HR, Lee WS, Yun SH, Chun HK. Tumor localization for
laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Surg 2007;31(7):1491-5
4. Trakarnsanga
A, Akaraviputh T. Endoscopic tattooing of colorectal lesions: Is it a risk free
procedure ? World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;3 (12):256-60
5. Cappell
MS, Courtney JT, Amin M. Black macular patches on parietal peritoneum and other
extra intestinal sites from intraperitoneal spillage and spread of India ink
from preoperative endoscopic tattooing: an endoscopic, surgical, gross
pathologic and microscopic study. Dig Dis Sci 2010;55(9):2599-2605
Authors:
Dr Nitin Vashistha, MS, FIAGES, FACS
Dr Dinesh Singhal, MS, FACS, DNB (Surg Gastro)
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology,
Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
E mail: gi.cancer.india@gmail.com
Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
E mail: gi.cancer.india@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment