Part A. Techniques of Colorectal Anastomoses
We attended the
recently held annual conference of the Society of American Gastrointestinal
& Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) in the lovely city of Baltimore, USA April
2019. This was a well organised scientific meeting that fully lived up to the
high standards expected of all SAGES meetings. Our team also presented 3 papers
including one on outcomes of colorectal surgery in our department (Outcomes
following colorectal surgery: A comparative study CR-POSSUM and ACS-NSQIP risk
calculator. Abstract published in Surg Endosc. 2019;33:S241)
One of the key
areas of focus for SAGES has been minimally invasive colorectal surgery (MI-CRS).
Through interactive sessions and hands on courses, acknowledged leaders in the
field discussed current best practices on wide range of subjects including techniques
of safe anastomosis and early identification and appropriate management of
anastomotic leaks.
Through a series
of blogs, we will present salient features and provide a brief literature
review pertaining to safe colorectal anastomosis:
A.
Techniques of colorectal
anastomosis
B.
Intraoperative assessment of
anastomotic integrity
C.
Management of anastomotic leak
First blog of the series covers part A and remaining parts B & C shall be covered in subsequent blogs.
First blog of the series covers part A and remaining parts B & C shall be covered in subsequent blogs.
A.
Techniques of colorectal anastomosis
1.
Ileocolic anastomosis following MI right colectomy: Extracorporeal
or Intracorporeal?
In
view of its technical simplicity, extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA) is currently
the preferred method for reconstruction following MI right colectomy. For ECA,
the specimen is delivered through the midline extraction site and anastomosis
is performed outside the abdomen.1 When ECA is planned, bowel
resection should preferably be done extracorporeal as this obviates of risk of
anastomosis between twisted bowel ends - particularly ileum.
Following
resection, depending on surgeon's preference, a side to side, isoperistaltic ileocolic
ECA can then be completed in classical hand sewn or stapled manner.
An Intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) is performed within the peritoneal cavity after the specimen is completely detached from surrounding structures. The specimen is 'bagged' and subsequently removed thorough Pfannenstiel incision.
ICA is a stapled, side to side ileocolic anastomosis. Special focus is needed towards a safe laparoscopic closure of enterotomy (for stapler access) in view of its propensity to leak. When doing a sutured closure, the standard two layer technique using running barbed suture in the first layer is reported to be associated with lesser incidence of leak and bleeding.2 The same study also reported totally stapled closure and robotic assisted are reported as non-inferior alternatives.2
A further valuable tip was provided by the expert panel during deliberations at the SAGES meeting - while doing a laparoscopic enterotomy closure with running barbed wire suture (V – Lock), absorbable clip should be applied after first stitch to keep this stitch snug.
ICA has several advantages including short term morbidity and shorter hospital stay3:
- Particularly suitable for obese patients and those with shortened mesentery
- No risk of 'twisted' anastomosis
- Less postoperative pain
- Better cosmetic outcomes
- Less prone to incisional hernia
- Lower complication rate
- Earlier discharge from the hospital
The disadvantages of ICA include:
An Intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) is performed within the peritoneal cavity after the specimen is completely detached from surrounding structures. The specimen is 'bagged' and subsequently removed thorough Pfannenstiel incision.
ICA is a stapled, side to side ileocolic anastomosis. Special focus is needed towards a safe laparoscopic closure of enterotomy (for stapler access) in view of its propensity to leak. When doing a sutured closure, the standard two layer technique using running barbed suture in the first layer is reported to be associated with lesser incidence of leak and bleeding.2 The same study also reported totally stapled closure and robotic assisted are reported as non-inferior alternatives.2
A further valuable tip was provided by the expert panel during deliberations at the SAGES meeting - while doing a laparoscopic enterotomy closure with running barbed wire suture (V – Lock), absorbable clip should be applied after first stitch to keep this stitch snug.
ICA has several advantages including short term morbidity and shorter hospital stay3:
- Particularly suitable for obese patients and those with shortened mesentery
- No risk of 'twisted' anastomosis
- Less postoperative pain
- Better cosmetic outcomes
- Less prone to incisional hernia
- Lower complication rate
- Earlier discharge from the hospital
The disadvantages of ICA include:
- Needs
high laparoscopic suturing skills
-
Needs more time
2.
Ileocolic anastomosis following MI right colectomy : Hand sewn or stapled
Recent
European studies (population based Swedish study, nationwide retrospective
Danish cohort study and a prospective multicenter study) have reported that the
anastomotic leak rate following ileocolic anastomosis in patients with right
colon cancer ranges between 3.2-8.4%4,5. Further these studies report
an increase (Odds ratio 2.04 -2.91) risk anastomotic leak following stapled anastomosis
as compared to hand sewn anastomosis4,5,6. Besides lower leak rate,
the latter has advantage of lower material costs also6.
3.
Left sided ICA without using staplers
Invited
experts through operative videos demonstrated robot assisted sigmoid colectomy
for diverticular disease. The resected colon was delivered through the anal
orifice thus obviating any incision to extract the specimen. The colorectal
anastomosis was then fashioned with interrupted sutures in single layer similar
to open surgery without using stapler.
Our technique:
We currently perform minimally invasive right colectomy with modified
complete mesocolic excision (mCME ; Figure 1) with central vascular ligation (CVL; Figure 2) for patients of right colon cancer. All patients have had extracorporeal side to side, isoperistaltic,
double layered, hand sewn ileo-colic anastomosis. We initiated minimally
invasive right colectomy 5 years ago and with this technique we have had no anastomotic leaks and all
patients had uneventful recovery.
Figure 1: Robotic right hemicolectomy for cancer colon - mCME
Figure 2: Robotic right hemicolectomy for cancer colon - CVL
References
1.
Cleary R K, Kassir A, Johnson C
S et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive
right colectomy: A multicenter propensity score matched comparative study.
Plos
One doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206277
2.
Milone M, Elmore U, Allaix ME
et al. Fashioning enterotomy closure
after totally laparoscopic ileocolic anastomosis for right colon cancer: a
multicenter experience
Surg
Endosc 2019 doi 10.1007/s00464-019-06796-w
3.
Van Oostendorp S, Elfrink A,
Borstlap W et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right
hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta analysis
Surg
Endosc 2017;31(1): 64-77
4.
Nordholm – Carstensen A,
Schnack Rasmussen M, Krarup PM. Increased leak rate following stapled versus
handsewn ileocolic anastomosis in patients with right colon cancer: A
nationwide cohort study
Dis
Colon Rectum 2019;62:542-548
5.
Frasson M, Granero – Castro P,
Ramos RJL et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity
and mortality after elective right colectomy for cancer: results from a
prospective multicentric study of 1102 patients.
Int
J Colorectal Dis 2016;31:105-14
6.
Gustaffson P, Jestin P, Gunnarson
U et al. Higher frequency of anastomotic leakage with stapled compared to hand
sewn ileocolic anastomosis in a large population based study. World J
Surg;39:1834-9
Dr Nitin Vashistha MS, FIAGES, FACS
Dr Dinesh Singhal MS, FACS, DNB (Surg Gastro)
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology,
Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
E mail: gi.cancer.india@gmail.com
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology,
Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
E mail: gi.cancer.india@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment